Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Jay Songer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1988No. 87-1344PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Legal counsel for a fugitive criminal defendant appeals from a sentence of property forfeiture imposed upon his client following a trial in absentia. Stephen Jay Songer was indicted under 21 U.S.C. § 848 (1982 & Supp. II 1984) for participating in a continuing criminal enterprise of marijuana and cocaine smuggling. Rather than submit to detention following his indictment, Mr. Songer elected to pay a cash bond imposed by the district court to ensure his appearance at future proceedings. Though he subsequently attended several pre-trial hearings and a scheduling conference…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Joseph v. Libretti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. United States v. Maria Guadalupe DevalleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Abeyta v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API