Legal Opinion
Peck v. Sony Music Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 2, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 18, 1994, which, inter alia, denied defendant Nevius’ motion to *158dismiss the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Executive Law § 296 (6) and (7) provide that an individual may be held liable for aiding and abetting discriminatory conduct. Patrowich v Chemical Bank (63 NY2d 541) is not a bar to maintenance of the action. Here, there are issues of fact as to defendant-appellant’s liability under Executive Law § 296 (6) and (7) as an aider and abettor of the alleged discriminatory conduct.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by23 opinions
- Murphy v. ERA United RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hicks v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ross v. Mitsui Fudosan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Lewis v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Tagare v. NYNEX Network Systems Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.