Legal Opinion

Shontz v. Torrey

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 30, 1948No. 5397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, Chief Judge.

The motion for a more definite statement is directed against the averments of the complaint to the effect that the defendant through its agent and servant “negligently drove a motor truck into collision with plaintiff’s automobile * * It is the contention of the defendant that a more definite statement of this averment is necessary to “enable defendant properly to prepare a responsive pleading or prepare for trial.”

The Amended Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., have eliminated from Rule 12 (e) the original provision and language, “to enable him properly to prepare his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. World of Mirth Shows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1944
  2. Wild v. KnudsenDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wycoff v. NicholsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
  2. Dmitry Andrianov v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)District Court, C.D. California · 2024
  3. Webb v. WebbDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API