Legal Opinion

Wild v. Knudsen

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 4, 1941No. Nos. 207, 208PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DARR, District Judge.

These are companion cases and substantially the same questions are raised for consideration. For this reason a decision will be announced in both cases in one opinion.

The cases were removed from a state court before initial pleading was filed. The relief sought is based upon negligence. The plaintiffs had prepared their declarations to be filed in the state court and when the causes were removed, filed their declarations as complaints in this court.

By motion the defendant seeks to strike certain portions of the declarations.

It is my judgment that the substance and form of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Shontz v. TorreyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API