Legal Opinion
Murray H. Ingalls v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 25, 1962No. 16788_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, an Air Force major with 14 years’ service and an outstanding war record, 1 was given the choice under Air Force Regulation 35-66 of resigning for the good of the service or facing a general court martial. Acting without counsel in the 72 hours allowed him, he chose to resign. Alleging failure on the part of the Air Force to afford him “the opportunity of consulting legal counsel regarding the advisability of submitting [his] resignation,” 2 he asks this court to reverse the summary judgment granted below denying him reinstatement.
Air Force Regulation 35-66, at least by implication,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior v. L. C. WahlenmaierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Ernest Paroczay v. Luther H. Hodges, Individually and as Secretary of Commerce of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Stacy Evers v. Herbert A. Buxbaum, T/a Rubin Optical Company, and Dr. Joseph FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John H. Dunmar v. Stephen Ailes, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Massman v. Secretary of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971