Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Noerring

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 20, 2018No. 20160837-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

Judge Michele M. Christiansen Forster authored this Opinion, in which Judges David N. Mortensen and Jill M. Pohlman concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge:

¶1 After Lynnette Noerring and Justine Noerring (collectively, the Noerrings) defaulted on a loan, Wells Fargo Bank, NA (Wells Fargo) prepared to foreclose on the real property that secured that loan. 1 A title search revealed, however, that, due to some missing words, the security interest in the property had not been effectively conveyed. Wells Fargo filed this action seeking, among other things, reformation of a vesting deed. Following a bench trial, the court amended the deed of trust entered into by the parties to reflect what all parties believed they were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bank of America v. AdamsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Equine Holdings v. Auburn WoodsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Roy Nielsen HafenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API