Legal Opinion
Rafael Triguero v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Third-Party v. Universal Maritime Service Corporation, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 19, 1991No. 873, Docket 90-7826PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-third-party plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrad”), appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge), following an order dismissing the third-party complaint against Universal Maritime Service Corporation (“Universal”) upon Universal’s motion for summary judgment. 601 F.Supp. 50. The district court held that Universal’s injured employee was an “employee” within the meaning of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., 1 making…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bordeaux v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Sinagra v. Atlantic Ocean Shipping, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Cunningham v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Anastasiou v. M/T WORLD TRUSTDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.