Legal Opinion
Hoth v. Valley Construction
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1983No. 6750PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is whether there is substantial evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Board’s conclusions that a disability is not work-related and that, assuming the disability was work-related, the claim for compensation is untimely. The facts recited below are undisputed, except as otherwise indicated.
Allan Hoth, a hod carrier, fell twelve to fourteen feet from a scaffolding to the ground below in September, 1971, while in the employ of Valley Construction. Hoth was bruised and shaken, but he did not visit a doctor, he was not disabled, and he…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Black v. Universal Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alaska State Housing Authority v. SullivanAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Rogers Electric Co. v. KoubaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Sonneman v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Norcon, Inc. v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Resler v. Universal Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.