Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendants 1 appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiff in this product liability case. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.
At trial, plaintiff offered evidence that he was injured while riding a three-wheeled 1985 model Honda ATC 350X all-terrain vehicle (ATV) that was manufactured and sold by defendants. 2 While his two brothers watched, he attempted to climb a steep embankment with the ATV. His brothers testified that one of them stood in the middle of a nearby road to serve as traffic lookout and that plaintiff was moving at “walking speed” when he went up the embankment.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Sheedy v. StallOregon Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State v. CristMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Market Tavern, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.