Legal Opinion

Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 26, 1991No. A8709-05897; CA A61587PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants 1 appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiff in this product liability case. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.

At trial, plaintiff offered evidence that he was injured while riding a three-wheeled 1985 model Honda ATC 350X all-terrain vehicle (ATV) that was manufactured and sold by defendants. 2 While his two brothers watched, he attempted to climb a steep embankment with the ATV. His brothers testified that one of them stood in the middle of a nearby road to serve as traffic lookout and that plaintiff was moving at “walking speed” when he went up the embankment.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Sheedy v. StallOregon Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. State v. CristMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Market Tavern, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API