Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De G-rafe, J:

Tbis case presents a question of law. The facts are not in dispute. The only claim of vantage asserted by plaintiff is based on the fact that a judgment in law on the second mortgage note was secured by him against „ , , ,,,,,, one Ford, the mortgagor, subsequently to the _ _ . _ date of the decree and sale of the real estate under the first mortgage foreclosure, in which appellant was made a party defendant, as the holder of the second mortgage on the real estate involved in said foreclosure action.

The controlling legal principle may be understood by a statement of. the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moody v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Clayton v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Witham v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Cooper v. MaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Escher v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Cadd v. SnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Anderson v. RenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API