Stiles v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
De G-rafe, J:
Tbis case presents a question of law. The facts are not in dispute. The only claim of vantage asserted by plaintiff is based on the fact that a judgment in law on the second mortgage note was secured by him against „ , , ,,,,,, one Ford, the mortgagor, subsequently to the _ _ . _ date of the decree and sale of the real estate under the first mortgage foreclosure, in which appellant was made a party defendant, as the holder of the second mortgage on the real estate involved in said foreclosure action.
The controlling legal principle may be understood by a statement of. the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moody v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Clayton v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Witham v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Cooper v. MaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Escher v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Cadd v. SnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Anderson v. RenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.