Legal Opinion

Witham v. Blood

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 13, 1904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court.— Hon. W. Gr. Thompson, Judge. The opinion states tbe case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The plaintiff’s petition in equity states her claim substantially as follows: That the defendants Celia E. Blood and Charles Blood were the owners of a tract of land upon a part of which plaintiff had a mortgage lien, which was junior to another mortgage made to Jones county, and assigned to one Sigworth. Sigworth’s mortgage was foreclosed by an action in equity, and the land was sold thereunder on April 11, 1898. The certificate of such sale was assigned to H. W. Witham December 4, 1898, and thereafter, on February 10, 1899, Celia E. Blood and Charles N. Blood conveyed the land by warranty…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ashcraft v. De ArmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Cooper v. MaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Brown v. J. H. Bell Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Pike v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Huling v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Ford v. OttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API