Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to annul a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

This is an action to annul a marriage on the ground, as set forth in the complaint, that at the time of the marriage the defendant was, and has ever since continued to be, a lunatic. The defendant, by her guardian ad litem, served an answer and upon the opening of the trial has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that “ the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that this plaintiff was not the proper person to commence this action and did not have the legal capacity to sue.”

The contention of the defendant is that an action for annulment on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Walter v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Ullman v. . CameronNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Van Tuyl v. New York Real Estate Security Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Meekins v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Gilels v. GilelsNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Whitney v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Angelo v. AngeloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kemmelick v. KemmelickNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API