Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Whitney

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This action was commenced by the service pursuant to an order of this court of the summons and complaint, upon the defendant personally, Charles M. Burdick, superintendent of the Dannemora State Hospital at Dannemora, N. Y., the attorney-general of the state of New York and upon Phileman R. Whitney, father and next friend of said defendant. By order of this court said Phileman R. Whitney was appointed guardian ad litem of said defendant and appeared in person at the trial.

The complaint asks for the annulment of the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant upon two grounds:

1. That the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  2. Perky v. PerryNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Jones v. . BrinsmadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Burtis v. BurtisNew York Court of Chancery · 1825
  5. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoadley v. HoadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Marvis v. MarvisNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API