Legal Opinion

Rieffer v. Home Indemnity Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1948No. 636PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

This case is here for the second time, the court having granted appellee’s motion for rehearing. The facts are fully set forth in our previous opinion, Rieffer v. Home Indemnity Co., D.C.Mun.App., 61 A.2d 26. Appellee urges that the prior decision, which held the basic affidavit in the attachment action defective and thus reversed the trial court, deprived him of the possibility of amendment. Although no motion for amendment was made below, the proceedings were such as not to require such a step. The trial court had found that the appellee’s affidavit was in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rieffer v. Home Indemnity Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington Building Services, Inc. And Crown Supply, Inc. v. United Janitorial Services, Inc. And New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Jack Development, Inc. v. Howard Eales, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Metro Rentals, Inc. v. WagnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API