Legal Opinion

Amerus Property Brokers v. Hicklin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1998No. 97-326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This case involves a real estate brokerage firm’s attempt to recover a commission on the renewal of a commercial lease between two parties originally brought together by the broker. The question is whether the second lease is a “negotiated renewal” qualifying for a commission under the parties’ listing agreement, or a totally “new” lease beyond the parties’ agreement. Ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court entered judgment for the broker. Because we believe the court correctly applied the contract’s “negotiated renewal” provision, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Lemars Mutual Insurance Co. v. JofferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Board of Regents of University System v. A. B. & E., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Consolidated Realty Co. v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AmerUs Bank v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API