AmerUs Bank v. Pinnacle Bank
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PRATT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Pinnacle Bank’s [hereinafter Defendant or Pinnacle] Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on December 9, 1998. Defendant seeks summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims. On April 12, 1999, Plaintiff AmerUs Bank [hereinafter Plaintiff or AmerUs] filed its Resistance to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and on April 22, 1999 Defendant filed its Reply. No hearing on this matter is deemed necessary and the matter is now considered fully submitted.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings
The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Valerie Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shelby County State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation v. Van Diest Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Eide v. Haas (In Re H & W Motor Express Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
- Shelby County State v. Van Diest SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002