Legal Opinion

AmerUs Bank v. Pinnacle Bank

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided June 9, 1999No. 4:98-cv-90314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PRATT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Pinnacle Bank’s [hereinafter Defendant or Pinnacle] Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on December 9, 1998. Defendant seeks summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims. On April 12, 1999, Plaintiff AmerUs Bank [hereinafter Plaintiff or AmerUs] filed its Resistance to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and on April 22, 1999 Defendant filed its Reply. No hearing on this matter is deemed necessary and the matter is now considered fully submitted.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Valerie Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shelby County State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation v. Van Diest Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Eide v. Haas (In Re H & W Motor Express Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  3. Shelby County State v. Van Diest SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API