Gwynn v. Homan
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hendriohs Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Iloman sued Owynn for obstructing a street in the town of Cartersburg, whereby special damages resulted to the plaintiff. Trial upon a general denial; judgment for the plaintiff.
The case turns upon the question, whether the place obstructed was a public street. All the evidence given upon the trial is in the record; and we think it fails to establish the fact of the street.
What is evidence of the existence of a street in a town or city? How may the faét be proved? It may be proved:
1. By a public plat of the town or city, on which the street is laid ■ down, together with user by the public of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Manderschid v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Faust v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Graham v. HartnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Gillespie v. DulingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.