Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Maday

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 24, 2015No. 13-3711, 14-2154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Robert Maday was convicted, in two separate proceedings before different judges (Chief Judge Castillo and Judge Gettleman) of the same federal district court (the Northern District of Illinois), of federal crimes closely related in both time and type. He was sentenced separately by the two judges, which has created complications that are the gist of his two appeals to us. Separate lawyers were appointed to represent Maday in these two appeals and each has moved to withdraw from the case on the ground that the appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tom Manuel v. J.A. TerrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Bud BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  4. Medford, Scott v. Emmerich, WardenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  5. Tom Manuel v. J.A. TerrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API