Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Roden

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 21, 2014No. 13-1191PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Everett Connolly seeks the grant of habeas corpus vacating his state court convictions from 2006 for drug distribution and trafficking on the grounds that the state proceedings violated his federal Confrontation Clause rights, as articulated in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009). The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) had acknowledged that there was Melendez-Diaz error but found it harmless under a standard equivalent to the federal standard under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lucien v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. American Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 7, International Ass'n of Bridge WorkersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Muller v. GoguenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Dorisca v. MarchilliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  5. Durand v. GoguenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API