Legal Opinion

Bates v. Asbury Iron & Bridge Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The basic question for decision on the facts of this workman’s compensation case, is whether the employer’s insurance carrier was properly deprived of the defense of the statute of limitations under the applicable provisions of the Accident Report Act of Pamph. L. 1924, ch. 187, p. 401, § 6.

On April 14th, 1930, Alfred Bates, 32 years of age and single, was employed, as an iron worker, by the Asbury Bridge and Iron Works, Inc., Neptune, New Jersey, at the weekly wage of $27.50. While so employed, he suffered an accident which concededly arose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UshkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. StarzmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Berlin v. Baltimore County BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Roussel v. GiesenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Tiffany & Co. v. StarzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gragg v. WM Harris & SonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. DeRousse v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API