Legal Opinion

Covitt v. Anderson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Robertson. Tried below before the Hon. R. S. Gould.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

Neither the petition for writ of error, nor the citation issued on the petition states the residence of either plaintiff or defendant in error. This is not in compliance with the statute nor the decisions of this court. (Article 1495, Paschal’s Digest; Eastman v. Heirs of Gray, 3 Texas, 514; Roberts v. Sollibellus, 10 Texas, 352; Owen and wife v. Tankersly, 12 Texas, 38.) And the return of the sheriff on the citation shows *263service on the attorney, without giving any reason for not serving the defendant. This service is not in accordance with the law. (Paschal’s Digest, article 1495; Halliman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. SollibellusTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Beavers v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. James v. Heirs of GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Owen v. TankerslyTexas Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krebs v. PoppCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API