Legal Opinion

Owen v. Tankersly

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Harrison. Motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The defendant in error moves to dismiss the writ, because, after a return of not found as to the principal, *39the same citation was served on the attorney of record. The service, however, in this respect, appears to be in accordance with the requirement of the statute; which is that if the party is a non-resident, or, as in*this ease, “ cannot be found, the citation may be served on the attorney of record,” &c. (Dig. Art. 793.) Ho reason is perceived why an alias citation should be issued for that purpose, if service is made before the return Term. To require it would be to occasion needless…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Covitt v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API