Britt v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of appellant of the crime of assault and battery with intent to kill under Burns’ §10-401a. Under the motion for a new trial the appellant claims error in the giving of instructions numbered 1, 2 and 4 by the, court. Instruction number 1, with the obj ections thereto; reads as follows:
“INSTRUCTION NO. 1
“You are instructed that malice may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon and that intent may be inferred from the circumstances in evidence and the use of a deadly weapon.
“Stice v. State, 87 N. E. 2d 915 (1950)
“s/ O. H. Roberts, Jr.
Pros.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
- McCoy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- May v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cockrum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Hayden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Gennaitte v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.