Legal Opinion

Britt v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1962No. 30,111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of appellant of the crime of assault and battery with intent to kill under Burns’ §10-401a. Under the motion for a new trial the appellant claims error in the giving of instructions numbered 1, 2 and 4 by the, court. Instruction number 1, with the obj ections thereto; reads as follows:

“INSTRUCTION NO. 1
“You are instructed that malice may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon and that intent may be inferred from the circumstances in evidence and the use of a deadly weapon.
“Stice v. State, 87 N. E. 2d 915 (1950)
“s/ O. H. Roberts, Jr.

Pros.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McCoy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. May v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cockrum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hayden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gennaitte v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API