Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
130 S.Ct. 876 (2010)
CITIZENS UNITED, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.
No. 08-205.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 24, 2009.
Decided January 21, 2010.
Reargued September 9, 2009.
Theodore B. Olson, for Appellant.
Floyd Abrams, for Senator Mitch McConnell as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the Appellant.
Elena Kagan, Solicitor General, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Seth P. Waxman, for Senator John McCain, as amici curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the Appellee.
Michael Boos, Fairfax, VA, Theodore B. Olson, Matthew D. McGill, Amir C.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Kennedy; Concurrence · Roberts; Concurrence · Scalia; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stevens; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Thomas.
2Cases cited145 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen ConcannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Doug Lair v. Jonathan MotlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Doug Lair v. Jonathan MotlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.