Legal Opinion

David Raboin v. Workday, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 28, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01230Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DAVID RABOIN, Case No. 3:23-cv-1230-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER EXPLAINING WHY COURT IS GRANTING v. DEFENDANT WORKDAY INC.’S MOTION FOR RULE 35 WORKDAY, INC., EXAMINATION Defendant. Dana L. Sullivan and Emerson Lenon, BUCHANAN ANGELI ALTSCHUL & SULLIVAN LLP, 621 SW Morrison Street, Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97205. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Darin Sands, BRADLEY BERNSTEIN SANDS LLP, 1211 NW Glisan Street, Suite 204, Portland, OR 97209; and Paul S. Cowie, John Ellis, and Gal Gressel, SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP, Four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Religious Technology Center Church of Scientology International v. Larry Wollersheim Leta Schlosser Richard Ofshe Margaret Singer Charles B. O'ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API