David Raboin v. Workday, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DAVID RABOIN, Case No. 3:23-cv-1230-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER EXPLAINING WHY COURT IS GRANTING v. DEFENDANT WORKDAY INC.’S MOTION FOR RULE 35 WORKDAY, INC., EXAMINATION Defendant. Dana L. Sullivan and Emerson Lenon, BUCHANAN ANGELI ALTSCHUL & SULLIVAN LLP, 621 SW Morrison Street, Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97205. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Darin Sands, BRADLEY BERNSTEIN SANDS LLP, 1211 NW Glisan Street, Suite 204, Portland, OR 97209; and Paul S. Cowie, John Ellis, and Gal Gressel, SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP, Four…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Religious Technology Center Church of Scientology International v. Larry Wollersheim Leta Schlosser Richard Ofshe Margaret Singer Charles B. O'ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.