Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Gray Line Motor Tours

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1928No. Appeal 236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The referee disallowed compensation and dismissed the petition; the board affirmed the referee; the court below reversed the board and directed it to allow the claimant such compensation as he may be entitled to receive under the law; this appeal by the defendant followed.

The referee 'found the following material facts: The defendant conducts sight-seeing busses in Philadelphia, which begin their trips from a point in front of Keith’s Theatre at 1116 Chestnut Street. On July ' 13, 1926, the claimant was in the employ of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Kunkel v. KunkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Lindsay v. DuttonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Curran v. Vang Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. McDevitt v. Checker Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McBride v. Hershey Chocolate Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation WorkersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Cherillo v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Kline v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Vordy v. Joseph Horne Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API