In Re Grievance of Baldwin
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Grievant appeals from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board that she could not contest her termination from her position with the Department of General Services because she had resigned from that position. She argues that a resignation is ineffective unless it is in writing, that the evidence shows that she did not resign, and, in any event, there was a constructive discharge.
Her argument that a resignation is ineffective if not written relies on a Department of Personnel rule requiring an employee to put a resignation in writing. See Vermont Department of Personnel, Rules and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation, AFT Local 3180 v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Vermont State Colleges Staff Federation, AFL Local 4023 v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Grievance of Darwin MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rennie v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Grievance of VSEA, BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995