Runge v. Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Attorney Gregory Ian Runge appeals from a Disciplinary Board decision affirming the Inquiry Committee West determination to admonish him for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.14 relating to representation of a client with limited capacity. The record does not clearly and convincingly establish Runge violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.14, and we dismiss the complaint.
I
[¶ 2] On September 17, 2009, Norman Franz executed a “durable unlimited power of attorney” authorizing his daughter, Rose Pfeifer, to act as his attorney-in-fact for decisions about his finances and property and explicitly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Estate of LittlejohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Toth v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KuhnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gerber v. Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Kuntz v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015