Legal Opinion

Runge v. Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20140135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Attorney Gregory Ian Runge appeals from a Disciplinary Board decision affirming the Inquiry Committee West determination to admonish him for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.14 relating to representation of a client with limited capacity. The record does not clearly and convincingly establish Runge violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.14, and we dismiss the complaint.

I

[¶ 2] On September 17, 2009, Norman Franz executed a “durable unlimited power of attorney” authorizing his daughter, Rose Pfeifer, to act as his attorney-in-fact for decisions about his finances and property and explicitly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re Estate of LittlejohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Toth v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KuhnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerber v. Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kuntz v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API