Milton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*826OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for capital murder. The jury assessed punishment at death.
Milton argues that the trial court impermissibly limited his voir dire of the jury panel by refusing to permit defense counsel to inquire as to the veniremen’s definitions of “deliberately”, “probability”, and “criminal acts of violence.” In Chambers v. State, 568 S.W.2d 313 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), we held that “[v]oir dire examination could take an unreasonable length of time if attorneys on both sides selected different words throughout a contemplated charge and asked each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Granviel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- O'BRYAN v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Escamilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.