Legal Opinion
Laird v. Leap
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1894No. 5873PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from the district court of Nuckolls county. Tri§d below before Bush, J. cited: Foxworthy v. Lincoln & F. R. Co., 13 Neb., 398; Wells, Jurisdiction, secs. 40, 43, 44, 66; 1 Black, Judgments, secs. 216-218.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant in error instituted an action in the county court of Nuckolls county to contest the election of plaintiff in error to the office of director of school district No. 7 of said county. It appears from the record that an answer was filed by the plaintiff in error, in which he alleged as one of the defenses the following:
“2. That the facts stated in said complaint do not state a cause of action or cause of contest over which this court has jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine the rights of the parties to the said office in controversy.”
It is stated in one of the briefs filed that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frans v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Foxworthy v. Lincoln & Fremont Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Williams v. SamuelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. MulvihillNebraska Supreme Court · 1898