Legal Opinion
Blumenfeld v. R. H. MacY & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1979No. Civ. 43100PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Real Estate Investment Trust of America, Inc. (REITA) and R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (Macy) appeal from a judgment in favor of Joseph Blumenfeld and the Sacramento Country Club Shopping Center, a partnership (collectively Blumenfeld).
Blumenfeld filed a complaint against Macy for $5 million general damages, alleging that Macy had breached an agreement to sublease space in Blumenfeld’s shopping center. REITA was brought into the action later when Blumenfeld sought a judicial declaration of whether Blumenfeld had assigned to REITA any right of action which Blumenfeld may have had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.