State v. Smith
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
After a bench trial, Jeffrey Paul Smith (“Defendant”) was found guilty of robbery in the first degree (§ 569.020) and armed criminal action (§ 571.015). 1 On appeal, Defendant alleges there was insufficient evidence adduced at trial to support his convictions. We disagree. We affirm.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Because Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, we must accept as true all evidence favorable to the State, including all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence while disregarding all evidence and inferences to the contrary. State v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Thompson v. RockettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. Jason D. NorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.