Legal Opinion

Husted v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 24, 2012No. Case No. 1:11-cv-56Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION (Doc. 25); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Doc. 37); AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET

TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.

This civil case is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for judgment: (1) Plaintiffs motion to reverse the administrative decision (Doc. 25); (2) Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the administrative record (Doe. 37); and (3) the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 38, 41, 45).

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Diane M. Moon v. Unum Provident CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API