Legal Opinion

Arnold G. Dorsey, A.K.A. Engelbert Humperdinck v. National Enquirer, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1992No. 90-55017, 90-55344PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This case failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. The panel voted unanimously to grant the petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of removing the references to Cox v. Los Angeles Herald Examiner because the California Supreme Court ordered the Cox opinion decertified.

The opinion filed on December 11, 1991 and cited at 952 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.1992) is withdrawn. A new opinion is filed herewith and the clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith.

*1433OPINION

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Arnold Dorsey, better known as Engel-bert…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florida Star v. B. J. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kilgore v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. George C. Reeves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Roone Arledge, and Everett Erlick v. Joseph O. Giaimo, Counterclaim-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Colton v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Lubin v. KuninNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. SchirmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Andrews v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Microsoft Corp. v. Yokohama Telecom Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API