Legal Opinion

Santo v. Santo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1949No. 16,109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

We will refer to the parties hereto as they appeared in the trial court, that is, Henry E. Santo, as plaintiff, and Recinda A. Santo, as defendant.

Plaintiff and defendant were married November 4, 1944, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where they continued to reside until they moved to Denver, April 28, 1946, bringing with them their infant daughter, Teresa, born March 17, 1946. Upon returning from a visit to her former home in Minnesota, September 7, 1947, defendant found conditions in her home such that after a full discussion thereof with plaintiff, it was agreed that defendant, with the baby,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Searle v. SearleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Duncan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Cairnes v. CairnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crail v. BlakelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Vigil v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. McMillion v. McMillionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API