Smith v. Magnuson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the warden from the grant of habeas corpus relief to petitioner Andrew Magnuson based on the habeas court’s determination that Magnuson’s guilty pleas were invalid and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons that follow, we find no error in the habeas court’s conclusion that Magnuson’s guilty pleas were invalid and, therefore, we affirm.
Magnuson was indicted by a Fayette County grand jury on charges of enticing a child for indecent purposes (two counts), possession of child pornography, and attempted kidnapping. In 2001,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tolbert v. TooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- FORD v. TATE (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. GarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Nelson v. WilkeySupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Winfrey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.