Legal Opinion

State v. Garland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 2021No. 21CA3947Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Garland,

2021-Ohio-3609.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case No. 21CA3947 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Anthony Garland, : Defendant-Appellant. : RELEASED 10/06/2021 APPEARANCES: Anthony G. Garland, Chillicothe, Ohio, pro se appellant. Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecutor and Jay S. Willis, Scioto County Assistant Prosecutor, Portsmouth, Ohio, for appellee. Hess, J. {¶1} Anthony Garland appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief in which he sought to vacate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cullen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. RinehartOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Bragdon v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API