Legal Opinion

Waterman's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1924No. Appeal, No. 152PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

When Isaac G. Waterman died, he had a vested one-sixth interest in his grandfather’s estate, which consisted of 7,100 shares of the capital stock of the Kingston Coal Company. That estate is not distributable until the decease of certain persons, some of whom are still living; his interest was vested, however, and he, or his personal representatives, were entitled to receive the *493dividends declared on Ms proportion-.of the stock, and the stock itself on the death of the last survivor of said persons.

By his will, he provided, inter alia, as follows:

“Sixth. I direct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earp's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. McKeown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Estate of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Eley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Blodgett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Waterhouse's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Yates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Flaccus's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Du Puy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API