Legal Opinion

Paul v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1905No. 5607PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered December 17, 1904, in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover a brokerage or commission, claimed by him on the sale of certain municipal bonds. The only question involved is the sufficiency of the complaint which, omitting its formal parts, reads as follows:

“(1) That at all the times herein mentioned the plaintiff’ was, and now is, engaged in the business of bond brokerage, buying, selling and negotiating for the sale of bonds and other securities, both municipal and private.
“(2) That at all times herein mentioned the defendant was, and now is, a municipal corporation of the first class organized and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. City of Bryan v. Page & SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Arnott v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Allen v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Crick v. RashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API