Legal Opinion
Hayford v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 12, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
The employee, Donald Hayford, appeals from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) reflecting a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission1, dated June 4, 1981, granting the employer, Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc., relief on the latter’s petition for review.
In the employee’s attempt three months earlier to appeal from a pro forma decree incorporating a Commission decision, dated February 27, 1981, to sustain the petition for review, we remanded the case to Superi- or Court for remand to the Workers’ Compensation Commission to include in the decision a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haney v. Lane Const. Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Curtis v. Bridge Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- DeRoche v. Bangor Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Hamilton v. Dexter Shoe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Marquis v. Keyes Fibre Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dillingham v. Andover Wood Products, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Christopher J. CuritSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Dillingham v. Andover Wood Products, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984