Dillingham v. Andover Wood Products, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
Andover Wood Products, Inc., and its insurance carrier appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, Appellate Division, affirming an award of compensation made by the Commission in response to a petition for review filed by Lenwood Dillingham. On appeal, Andover Wood Products and its insurance carrier contend, inter alia, that there was insufficient evidence to support the restoration of compensation and that .the award should have been barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We conclude that both the restoration of compensation and the decision affirming…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dufault v. Midland-Ross of Canada, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Conners' CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Haney v. Lane Const. Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Hafford v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Madore v. Bangor Roof & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wentworth v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Folsom v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Every v. Northeastern Log Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Bushey v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.