Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1970No. Docket 6,515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Defendant was tried by a jury for carrying a concealed weapon contrary to CL 1948, § 750.227 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.424) and he was *442convicted. His appeal raises several issues, the first of which relates to the admissibility of the weapon in evidence. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the weapon and the motion was denied.

Although the trial court denied the motion to suppress on the basis of Const 1963, art 1, § 11, and defendant contends here that under Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 US 643 (81 S Ct 1684, 6 L Ed 2d 1081, 84 ALR2d 933), this section of the state constitution is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. People v. RamosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PealsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BoswellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. PealsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API