Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance Company v. Tungsten Heavy Powder & Parts, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 11, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01197Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FEDERAL INSURANCE Case No.: 21cv1197-W-MDD COMPANY, 12 ORDER DENYING NON-PARTY’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES v. 14 TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER & [ECF No. 70] 15 PARTS, INC. and TUNGSTEN 16 PARTS WYOMING, INC., 17 Defendants. 18 BACKGROUND 19 20 This is an insurance coverage dispute concerning Defendants’ claim for 21 loss of business income under a commercial insurance policy. (ECF No. 1). 22 The current motion concerns a non-party’s request for attorney’s fees against 23 Plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Daniel O'Connell v. Jose Fernandez-PolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodco AutobodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API