Legal Opinion

Doggyphone LLC v. Tomofun LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 24, 2023No. 2:19-cv-01901Unknown

1Opinion

2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 DOGGYPHONE LLC, NO. 2:19-cv-1901-BJR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 9 TOMOFUN, LLC, JUDGMENT AND DENYING Defendant PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 10 SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff DoggyPhone, LLC’s Motion for Partial 13 Summary Judgment, and Defendant Tomofun, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. Nos. 14 52 & 54. This case concerns

U.S. Patent No. 9,723,813

(“the ’813 patent”), owned by 15 DoggyPhone. DoggyPhone has accused…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Carl B. Bai v. L & L Wings, Inc., D/B/A Wings, and Great World Co. Of New York Ltd., and Elufa Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API