Legal Opinion

Hitesman v. University of Utah

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 23, 2021No. 20190884-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

2021 UT App 99

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MISTY VONDELL HITESMAN, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190884-CA Filed September 23, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Mark S. Kouris No. 170900636 Mary J. Woodhead, Attorney for Appellant Sean D. Reyes and J. Clifford Petersen, Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE JILL M. POHLMAN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES DAVID N. MORTENSEN and DIANA HAGEN concurred. POHLMAN, Judge: ¶1 For nearly nine years, Misty Vondell Hitesman worked as a sponsored project officer at the University of Utah in its Office of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lynda Fallon v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Brookhaven General HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. California Brewers Assn. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API