Walling v. Miller & Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Thirteenth District. For facts, see opinion. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Field, C. J. concurring.
Defendants were expressmen, with an office at Coulterville, in Mariposa county. One George W. Coulter was their agent. Walling, the plaintiff, delivered to defendants a quantity of amalgam, to be forwarded to San Francisco, to be there coined, and returned. This amalgam belonged to five persons, who were partners in quartz mining, the plaintiff and one Carpenter among them. On the first of July, 1858, while this property was in the hands of these carriers, Carpenter sold to plaintiff, for a valuable consideration, his interest in this amalgam, and gave his receipt to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hardy v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bellingham Bay Boom Co. v. BrisboisWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- John Costello, as Trustee of the Estate of William Jason Evans, Bankrupt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.