Legal Opinion

Teac Corp. of America v. Bauer

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1984No. 82CA1215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.*

Defendant (Bauer) appeals a judgment entered after a trial to the court holding him liable under a personal guarantee for a corporate debt. We affirm.

Plaintiff (Teac) is a manufacturer of audio equipment. Bauer was an officer of A.M.I. Audio Brokers, Inc., (AMI) a retailer of audio equipment whose purchases from Teac were financed by Finance America Private Brands, Inc., (Finance America) under a “commercial floor plan” security agreement. Teac presented evidence that when AMI fell into arrears to Finance America, Teac paid AMI’s debt to Finance America in return for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. United States v. Dennis Lee UllrichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Thomas Joseph CarrancoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  5. Great West Food Packers, Inc. v. Longmont Foods Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downing Ex Rel. Downing v. Overhead Door Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. HuehnColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Fritzler v. Mitchell (In re Estate of Fritzler)Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API