Legal Opinion

Murbach v. Ingersoll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1939No. Nos. 916 & 917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By McCURDY, J.

Due to the fact that the same principles of law are applicable to the two cases captioned as above and numbered 916 and 917, respectively, in this court, these appeals on questions of law and fact are presented and disposed of together. The facts in each case are somewhat different, the salient, undisputed portions of which we will set forth in the order of their presentation.

In case No. 916 six parties — Murbach, now deceased, Ingersoll, Roe, Cook, Crooks, and Parsch, now deceased— purchased from C. A. Glass a number of shares of stock of the Colson Company and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norris v. ChurchillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Jewett v. MaythamNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frank Lerner & Associates, Inc. v. VassyOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Andwur Mortgage-Loan Co. v. MurbachOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API