Norris v. Churchill
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellee sued the appellant for contribution. They, with three others, jointly purchased *669a horse, each of the five purchasers paying,one-sixth part of the price. The remaining one-sixth part of the purchase-money they borrowed from a bank upon their joint promissory note payable at said bank upon demand. The appellant, without the knowledge or consent of the appellee, paid to the bank the one-fifth part of the amount of the note in cash. The other makers thereof, on the same day, gave their joint promissory note, negotiable by the law merchant, to the bank for the balance, being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aspinwall v. . SacchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. AcresIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Bragg v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Nally v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Quarries Co. v. LayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Parrott v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Gates v. FauvreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hedges v. MehringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.