Legal Opinion
COM., DEPT. OF LABOR & IND. v. EA Clore Sons
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 11, 1981No. Record 800688PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in holding that consent to an administrative search is always invalid unless the one consenting to the search is informed that, as a result of the search, his company might be cited for violations of administrative regulations.
On February 28, 1979, Alexander Mayes, an employee of the Department of Labor and Industry, arrived at a factory operated by E. A. Clore Sons, Inc. (hereafter, “E.A. Clore”), to conduct an inspection for violations of worker safety regulations. According to testimony produced by E. A. Clore, Mayes introduced…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 1995 CORVETTE VIN 1G1YY22P585103433 v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Addison v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- 1995 CORVETTE VIN 1G1YY22P585103433 v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Commonwealth v. TurnerVirginia Circuit Court · 2000
- Dennis Wayne Toney v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.